Archive

Archive for the ‘Employment Law’ Category

Flexible working

January 17th, 2010

An employee with child care responsibilities (or with responsibilities for an adult relative who requires care), can make a formal application for a variation of their contract to enable them to care for the child or relative, by completing a prescribed form and following a set procedure.

An employee must have worked for their employer for 26 weeks and must not have made another application to work flexibly in the last 12 months.

The request can specify hours, days, place of work including working from home) and shift patterns requested.

There is a specific form which can be used:

On receipt of an appplication for flexible working, the employer must arrange a meeting to discuss the application within 28 days. The employee may bring a work colleague with them for the meeting.

The employer then has a further 14 days to make a decision in relation to the application.
The employer is entitled to refuse the application on a number of grounds:-
· Burden of additional costs.
· Detrimental effect on ability to meet customer demand.
· Inability to reorganise work among existing staff.
· Inability to recruit additional staff.
· Detrimental impact on quality.
· Detrimental impact on performance.
· Insufficiency of work during the periods the employee proposes to work.
· Planned structural changes.

If the employee is not happy with the employer’s response they have the right to appeal against this decision. The appeal should be in writing and should state the reason they think the employer’s decision was wrong.

The employer must arrange an appeal meeting within 14 days and the employee is entitled to bring a work colleague to the meeting.

The employer must make a decision in relation to the appeal within 14 days of the appeal meeting.

 
Links

ACAS guidance

Government guidance

 

Disclaimer

 Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Equal Pay

January 17th, 2010

Definition and Scope

The Equal Pay Act provides that women should be paid the same as men if they do the same job or do a job rated as equivalent or of equivalent value. It also provides that other terms of employment should be the same.

It does so by implying an “equality clause” into employees’ contracts of employment so that any employer who pays a woman less than a man in similar employment is deemed to be in breach of this implied term of the contract.

Broadly speaking a woman has the right to the same terms of employment as a man if:-

1. They do the same job or a job which is broadly similar
2. Their jobs are rated as equivalent by a job evaluation study
3. Their job is of equal value in terms of the demands made (for instance under such headings as effort, skill and decision),

An employer can justify a difference in pay if the difference is genuinely due to a material factor other than the difference in gender, or that if it does directly or indirectly discriminate against women that it can be objectively justified.
 

Enforcing rights

Equal pay covers both employees and women working under a contract personally to execute any work or labour.

Employees who wish to bring claims of Equal Pay can issue a claim in the Employment Tribunal. There is no qualifying period of employment, before a claim can be made, but any claim must be registered with the Tribunal either during the employment under the unequal contract or within 6 months of the employment under that contract coming to an end.

Where a claimant wishes to claim more than 6 months after the employment coming to an end it is also possible to bring a claim in the County Court within 6 years of that employment coming to an end.

An Employment Tribunal which upholds a claim of Equal Pay can declare what the pay and/or other terms of the contract should be to be lawful and can award the difference between what the employee was paid and what she should have been paid for a period going back up to 6 years from when the claim was started.

There is a provision for a potential Claimant to obtain information in relation to a potential claim for Equal Pay by sending a questionnaire to the employer.

In a claim for work of equal value an Employment Tribunal may decide itself on the evidence presented whether the work is of equal value or it may order a report from a member of the panel of independent experts to determine whether the work in the 2 jobs being compared is of equal value.
 

Links

Equality and Human rights Commission Leaflet

More information from the Equality & Human Rights Commission

Government guidance
 

Links specifically for employers

EHRC Equal Pay Toolkit for employers
ACAS Guidance on pay systems

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Employment Contracts

January 17th, 2010

Non-employment contracts

Not everyone who apparently works for an employer is an employee in the legal sense.

Other contracts include:-

· Agency Staff
· Self-employed contractors
· Self-Employed workers

Some people who are paid as if they were self employed might be deemed to be employees if in all other respects they are treated as employees. In other words the label “self employed” will be a meaningless label if the true nature of the basis under which they work is that of an employee.

People who work under either of the above arrangements might be classed as “workers,” this gives them some rights that employees have (e.g. the right to paid holiday leave, minimum wage, breaks and maximum working hours).

A worker is someone who works personally for someone who is more like a boss than a client or customer of a business. Many self employed individuals are totally dependent on one person or company who provides them with work full time, this is typical in the construction industry. Often they will have the status of “worker.”

Agency staff may be employees of the agency or, more commonly will have the status of “worker.”

Only employees have the right to minimum set notice periods, redundancy payments and the right not to be unfairly dismissed.

Employees, workers, agency staff and self employed contractors all have the right not to be unlawfully discriminated against.

ACAS guidance for agency workers

 

Employment Contracts

A contract is an agreement supported by some payment. It is not the same as a written document. Many employment contracts are recorded in writing but anyone who works as an employee has an “employment contract” even if it is only verbal.

 

Written contracts

An employer should provide an employee with written terms of employment after 2 months, these must cover the matters listed in section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. If they don’t an employee can apply to an Employment Tribunal for an order requiring the employer to provide these or declaring what the terms of the contract are.

 

Terms incorporated by law

The law provides certain terms must be implied into a contract of employment whatever it says, so for example the law requires minimum notice periods for employers to give to employees, a minimum wage, paid holidays and maximum working hours.

 

Changing the contract

An employment contract can only be changed by agreement. An employer cannot impose changes on the employee against the employee’s will. However, if the employee continues working without protest to new terms and conditions, they will be taken to have accepted them by their actions.

An employer who insists on changes against the employee’s will risks the employee resigning and claiming constructive dismissal.

An employer who wishes to impose changes against an employee’s will must given lawful notice to terminate the employment and offer a new contract on new terms and conditions, this may or may not still be an unfair dismissal depending on the precise circumstances.

 

TUPE transfers

If an employee has joined the employer as a result of a transfer of undertakings, then they have the right to have their existing terms and conditions preserved. Any detrimental change to their terms and conditions which has been made by reason of the transfer will be void. This means even if they agree to the changes, if the changes are found to be due to the transfer they will be deemed not to take effect.

There is nothing preventing a transferred employee’s terms and conditions changing, as long as the change is not by reason of the transfer. However, harmonising terms and conditions of employees may in many cases be deemed to be by reason of the transfer, even if this takes palce some time after the transfer.

Click here for more information.

 

Restrictive Covenants

There are some terms of an employment contract which continue to operate after employment has come to an end.

There is an implied term of confidentiality in all contracts of employment which means that employees cannot take confidential information about the employer’s business with them after their employment comes to an end.

There can also be specific written terms of the contract which restrict what work an employee can do after the employment comes to an end. These are known as “restrictive covenants.” Usually they specify a period of time and often a geographic restriction on an employee setting up or working for a competing business, or poaching employees to come and work with them.

If an employee breaches a restrictive covenant or the implied duty of confidentiality, an employer can take an injunction out against them and claim compensation for loss of profits, and their legal costs.

However, if the Court finds that the restrictions go further than is necessary to protect the employer’s interests then the whole restriction becomes void. This could be disastrous for an employer who will be unable to prevent the old employee competing, and find that any other employees who leave may feel they can safely ignore the restrictions.

For this reason it is important that advice and careful thought is given when putting restrictive covenants into a contract to make sure they have the desired effect, without going too far.

 

Links

ACAS guidance

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Discrimination

January 17th, 2010

Discrimination

Scope of the law prohibiting discrimination

As set out in the Equality Act 2010, it is unlawful to discriminate against employees because of one or more of the following “protected characteristics”

1. Race
2. Sex

3. Marriage and Civil Partnerhsip

4. Gender Reassignment (Transgender)

5. Disability
6. Age
7. Religion or Belief
8. Sexual orientation

9. Pregnancy & maternity

The scope of unlawful discrimination against job applicants and employees includes prohibition of discrimination in offering employment, in the terms of employment, refusing employment, in the way the employer provides access to promotion, transfer, training or receiving any other benefit, subjecting a person to a detriment or dismissing them.

Discrimination is not only unlawful on the basis of an employee’s own “protected characteristic,” but also if it is because of the employee’s association with someone with a protected characteristic or the employer’s perception that the employee has a protected characteristic.

The scope of anti discrimination legislation covers not only employees and workers but much wider areas including contractors and those providing services.

Types of discrimination

It is unlawful to directly discriminate against a person by treating them less favourably because of a protected characteristic.

It is also unlawful to indirectly discriminate against a person by imposing a provision, criterion or practice which puts persons of a particular group at a disadvantage compared to others.  An example of this might be requiring a vacancy only to be filled by a full time worker, if it can be shown that this puts women at a disadvantage, because, for example, women with young children are less likely to be able to comply with it than men.

Disability discrimination also incorporates the concept of a “reasonable adjustment” which requires employers to consider adjustments to remove disadvantages to a disabled worker’s working conditions.

In some circumstances an employer may be able to justify less favourable treatment.

The law prohibiting unlawful discrimination also provides for claims of unlawful  harassment. Harassment is defined as unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic, which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading humiliating or offensive environment.

It is also unlawful to victimise someone for complaining about discrimination.

Enforcing rights

Claims of unlawful discrimination can be brought by job applicants, employees, workers, contractors, and others by issuing a claim in the Employment Tribunal. There is no qualifying period of employment, before a claim can be made, but any claim must be registered with the Tribunal within 3 months of the act of discrimination, or where there has been a series of incidents which can be characterised as a single act of discrimination, within 3 months of the latest  incident of discrimination.

Employers are liable for the discriminatory conduct of their employees even if they did not know about it at the time. Exceptionally, if an employer has done all it can do to prevent unlawful discrimination, it may be able to avoid liability.

Claims can also be brought against the individuals who caused the discrimination, employees might choose to do this because they want the individual to be liable for what they did, if there is a risk that the employer can avoid liability, or if there is a risk of the employer’s business going into liquidation.
Links

ACAS

Government advice on discrimination law

Equality and Human Rights Commission

The Equality Act 2010

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Disability discrimination

January 17th, 2010

Introduction to disability discrimination

The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful to discriminate against someone because of their disability, their perceived disability or because they associate with someone who has a disability. This would, for example, include an able bodied person who cares for a disabled family member.

It is also unlawful to indirectly discriminate against a person because of their disability by imposing a provision, criterion or practice, which puts them at a disadvantage when compared to others.

The Equality Act also requires employers to make reasonable adjustments to remove disadvantages to the disabled individual’s working conditions, whether that is a physical feature or a working practice.

Definition of a “Disability”

The definition of disability covers anyone who has a physical or mental impairment which has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on their ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The effect of an impairment is long term if it has lasted, or is likely to last at least 12 months or it is likely to last for the rest of the life of the person affected.

Examples of disabilities include diabetes, epilepsy, long term depression, and sleep apnoea. Severe disfigurement is also considered to be disability.

Some conditions automatically constitute disabilities even if they have not got to the stage where they have a substantial effect, these are HIV, Cancer and MS.

Duty to make “Reasonable Adjustments.”

The times when an employer is obliged to consider making reasonable adjustments includes:-
· When recruiting and interviewing for an employee
· When an employer becomes aware of an employee’s disability
· If an employee asks for adjustments to be made
· If an employee is having difficulty with any aspect of their job
· If an employee’s sickness record, length of sickness absence or delay in returning to work while off sick is linked to their disability.

In appropriate cases, reasonable adjustments could include:-

· Making adjustments to the employee’s duties
· Allowing the employee more time to carry out a part of their duties
· Adaptations to their work station, equipment or seating
· Adjustments to their working hours or breaks
· A phased return to work following illness
· Allowing the employee to work from home
· Allowing time off for treatment
· Access to facilities for the control of their condition
· Availability of written material in large print
· Disregarding disability related sickness absences when operating an attendance management programme
· More time to pass their probationary period
· Redeploy the employee to an existing vacancy

Not all these examples would be appropriate in all circumstances, the key question is whether the proposed adjustment is reasonable.  What is reasonable, may depend on:

· the extent to which taking the step would prevent the effect in relation to which the duty is imposed;
· The extent to which it is practical for the employer to take the step;
· The financial and other costs which would be incurred
· The extent to which taking it would disrupt any of his activities;
· The extent of the employer’s financial and other resources;
· The availability to him of financial or other assistance
· The nature of the employer’s activities and the size of the undertaking;

A detailed guide for employers on making reasonable adjustments is available from the Equality & Human Rights Commission

The code of Practice gives practical guidance on how to prevent discrimination against disabled people.

Financial assistance may be available to employers through “Access to work” which is available from Job Centre Plus

Scope of unlawful disability discrimination

The scope of unlawful discrimination against job applicants and employees includes prohibition of discrimination in offering employment, in the terms of employment, refusing employment, in the way the employer provides access to promotion, transfer, training or receiving any other benefit, subjecting a person to a detriment or dismissing them.

Disability related harassment is also unlawful. Harassment is defined as unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading humiliating or offensive environment.

It is also unlawful to victimise someone for complaining about disability discrimination.

Pre-employment Health Questionnaires

The Equality Act 2010 prohibits employers asking job candidates questions about their health unless it is to check that the candidate can perform an “intrinsic function” of the job, to see if any adjustments to the recruitment process need to be made, or to monitor their compliance with Equal Opportunities.

Any other questions about a candidate’s health for any other purpose must wait until they have been offered employment.

Enforcing rights

Claims of unlawful discrimination can be brought by job applicants, employees, workers, contractors, and others by issuing a claim in the Employment Tribunal. There is no qualifying period of employment, before a claim can be made, but any claim must be registered with the Tribunal within 3 months of the last incident of discrimination.

A guide incorporating the questionnaire is produced by the Disability Rights Commission.

Employers are liable for the discriminatory conduct of their employees even if they did not know about it at the time. Exceptionally, if an employer has done all it can do to prevent unlawful discrimination, it may be able to avoid liability.

Claims can also be brought against the individuals who caused the discrimination, employees might choose to do this because they want the individual to be liable for what they did, if there is a risk that the employer can avoid liability, or if there is a risk of the employer’s business going into liquidation.

Links

ACAS

Direct Government website

DWP guidance on employing disabled people

Equality and Human rights Commission

Access to work

MS Society

Royal National Institute for the Blind

Parkinsons Disease Society

Royal National Institute for the Deaf

MIND

Diabetes UK

British Epilepsy Association

Terence Higgins Trust

Back Care

MacMillan Cancer Support

The Sleep Apnoea Trust

The Dyspraxia Foundation

British Dyslexia Association

Asthma UK

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Constructive dismissal

January 17th, 2010

Constructive Dismissal

 

Introduction to the concept of constructive dismissal

 

Where an employee feels forced to resign there may be a claim of “constructive dismissal.”

This arises when the employer is in breach of a “fundamental term” of the employee’s employment contract.

Fundamental terms of an employment contract include pay, hours, working conditions, and ( most commonly relied on) the implied term of trust and confidence.

 

Constructive Dismissal: the implied term of trust and confidence

If an employee has been treated in such a way that the Employment Tribunal conclude they should not have to put up with it, then there has been a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence.

 

Constructive Dismissal: linking the breach of contract with the decision to resign

It is not enough that there is a breach of a fundamental term by the employer, the employee has to show that this was the reason they resigned.

 

Constructive Dismissal: the effect of delay before resigning

An employee must not leave it too long before resigning. Any delay in resigning of more than a couple of weeks or so may disqualify the employee from claiming constructive dismissal, but there is no set time set for a deadline. In any case, where an employee relies on a course of conduct by an employer, as long as the employee does not delay too long after the last act, the claim is still valid. In other words trust and confidence can be gradually eroded over a period of time.

 

Constructive Dismissal: assessing the seriousness of the employer’s conduct

An employer’s conduct must be viewed objectively, even if it has actually caused the employee to lose trust in the employer, it is the conduct which is to be judged, not the effect it had. Employers can be unreasonable, rude or difficult without necessarily being in breach of this term!

Employers may also occasionally find themselves in breach of this term despite acting with the best of motives.

Where an employee has been constructively dismissed, it is usually also an unfair dismissal.

 

Tips for finding a solicitor to deal with a claim of unfair constructive dismissal

Specialist legal knowledge and experience is a good start, but to “get the edge” it is useful to find a solicitor with experience of representing clients at Employment Tribunals, particularly at the Employment Tribunal where your case is likely to be heard. This is because familiarity with the way a Tribunal is likely to assess particular cases and particular circumstances helps effective advice and preparation right from the start.

Most of our experience here at John Halson solicitors is based in representing clients at the Liverpool Employment Tribunal which covers claims arising from people who have worked in north and central Cheshire including Chester, Warrington, Northwich, Middlewich, Winsford, Tarporley, Ellesmere Port, Great Sutton; and Merseyside including Liverpool, Birkenhead and the Wirral,  Widnes, Runcorn, St Helens, Kirkby, Maghull, Skelmersdale, Ormskirk, Southport, and Formby.

We also regularly appear in the Manchester Employment Tribunal and occasionally in the Leeds, Birmingham and Shrewsbury Tribunals.

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Compromise Agreements

January 17th, 2010

What is a compromise agreement?

Compromise agreements are normally used by employers either before, at the time of or after terminating or varying an employee’s contract of employment.

The object of a compromise agreement is to provide the employee with certain benefits under the agreement, usually a severance payment and a guaranteed reference, in return for an agreement not to pursue a claim against the employer in the future.

 
Advantages to the employer

1. It can enable the employer to end the employment more quickly
2. It can enable the employer to dispense with some or all of the formal procedures which would otherwise be necessary to fairly dismiss an employee
3. It guarantees that the employer will not have to face an Employment Tribunal or Court claim
4. An employer can protect itself against having business or employees taken by the employee in the future by including “restrictive covenants.”
5. An employer can protect its reputation by including a clause that the employee will not make any derogatory statements about the employer
6. The employer can require the circumstances surrounding the termination of the employment to be kept confidential

 
Advantages to the employee

1. Obtain a severance payment more than they would otherwise be entitled to
2. Not have to pay tax or national insurance on the first £30,000 of the severance payment
3. Have a guaranteed reference
4. Can keep the circumstances of the termination of employment confidential
5. Receive payment a lot quicker than it would take to pursue a Tribunal claim
6. Have their legal fees paid by the employer

 
Compromise Agreements which vary a contract

Although compromise agreements are usually used to end an employment contract, sometimes they can be used to vary the contract. In other words an employer may seek to offer an “up front” payment to employees in return for them agreeing less favourable terms and conditions.

 

Risks to employers

An employer should always take care when offering a compromise agreement. An employer can end up giving an employee who rejects a compromise agreement a stronger potential claim if the employer has committed themselves to a particular course of action. It may be more difficult to show a dismissal is fair if a compromise agreement was offered first.

 
Formalities to make the agreement valid

To enable a compromise agreement to be effective, it has to be correctly worded and must provide for the employee to obtain independent legal advice from a solicitor or other qualified advisor who must sign the agreement to confirm they have advised the employee. Normally, although the employee can choose the adviser, the employer pays because it is in the employer’s interests to have a legally binding agreement.

 

Role of the employee’s legal adviser

The legal advisor is not simply “rubber stamping” the agreement, they are advising the employee, and the advice may be to reject the offer or to negotiate a better offer or amend wording of the agreement. However, the employee has the final say.

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Unfair Dismissal: Capability

January 17th, 2010

 

Unfair Dismissal: Capability

This category covers the employee’s ability to do the job and unlike misconduct does not depend on any “fault” on the part of the employee. If an employee’s health or abilities are not up to the demands of the job then, provided the employer acts fairly, dismissal (with notice) can be justified.

 

Capability: Ability to do the job

If an employee is not doing their job in the way the employer requires the employer should investigate whether that is due to any lack of application on the part of the employee  (in which case disciplinary proceedings could be contemplated) or whether it is due to the employee’s lack of ability in one or more of the tasks required.

If the employer considers it to be due to any lack of ability, the employee must be informed of:-
1. How their work does not measure up,
2. The standards expected of the employee
3. A timescale to improve at the end of which the employer will assess the employee
4. Any support, training or advice available to the employee

 

As long as the employee is made aware in sufficient detail to enable them to know precisely what improvement is expected of them, and as long as they have been given a reasonable amount of time and a reasonable amount of support to enable them to improve, the employer is entitled to consider dismissal at the end of the improvement period if the employee has still not reached the standards expected.

At this point the employer should

1. Invite the employee to a hearing and letting the employee know in advance:-

1.1 The specific shortfalls in the standards of their work

1.2 That the decision could result in dismissal

1.3 The evidence to show the employee’s work is below standard

1.4 The employee’s right to bring a Union rep or work colleague to the meeting

 

2. If the employee is found not to have reached the standards required whether either:-

2.1 A further period of improvement should be allowed

2.2 There is a another vacancy within the employee’s abilities which the employee could fill

2.3 Dismissal is the appropriate conclusion

 

3. Inform the employee of the right to appeal.

 

The employer should ensure it complies with the requirement of the ACAS code of practice.

If the employer has a suitable vacancy this should be offered to the employee, the employee does not have the right to have their previous terms and conditions preserved, but the employee is entitled to the appropriate notice before they start the new role

If the employer decides to dismiss the employee is entitled to the appropriate notice of termination.

 
Capability: Sickness

An employee who is off sick for a prolonged period of time can be fairly dismissed if they are unlikely to be well enough to return to work within a reasonable time.

What amounts to a reasonable time depends on the nature of the job, the specific difficulties encountered by the employer in covering for the absence and the size and administrative resources of the employer.

However, even where an employer is easily able to cover the absent employee’s work and even where it costs the employer nothing to keep the job open, an employer is not expected to have to keep the job open indefinitely.

Before an employer can justify dismissing an employee for long term sickness they must:-

1. Investigate the employee’s sickness and specifically find out how long it is likely to be before the employee will be able to return to work

2. Arrange a meeting for the employee to respond to any information the employer has and put their point of view forward if they think their job should remain open longer

 

The investigation

The investigation is likely to involve speaking to the employee and carrying out some medical investigation. The employer can ask the employee to sign an authority to enable the employer to obtain copies of their medical records, and the employer can ask them to attend a medical examination. An employee is under no obligation to agree to these, but as long as the employer has attempted to carry out these investigations any subsequent dismissal is unlikely to be unfair.

It is important that the employer bears in mind at all times that if the employee is deemed to be disabled under the provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act, the employer is required to consider whether there are any reasonable adjustments that can be made to enable the employee to return to work. Both employer and employee need to be involved in these discussions: the employer best knows what he requires and the employee best knows his own restrictions.  When commissioning a medical report the employer should ask the Doctor to consider whether the employee is disabled and whether there are reasonable adjustments which would enable the employee to return to work. [See Disability Discrimination]

 

The meeting

1. Invite the employee to a meeting and let the employee know in advance:-

1.1 That the decision could result in dismissal

1.2 The medical evidence which the employer has obtained

1.3 The employee’s right to bring a Union rep or work colleague to the meeting

 

2. If the employer concludes that the employee is unlikely to be well enough to return to their job within a reasonable time the employer should consider:

2.1 Whether there are any vacancies which can be offered to the employee which the employee could do now or in the near future,

2.2 Whether there are any reasonable adjustments which could be made to enable the employee to return to work (if the employee is disabled)

 

3. Inform the employee of the right to appeal.

 

Notice of termination

An employee who is dismissed while off sick is normally entitled to their statutory notice pay at their full normal rate of pay, even though they are likely to be uable to work their notice and even where they are not entitled to pay whilst off sick. Statutory notice pay is one week’s pay for up to 2 years of their employment and after that one week for every year of their employment up to a maximum of 12 weeks. See Notice.

 

Where the employer has caused the employee’s sickness

In some cases, the employee’s sickness absence may have been caused by the employer, for example due to an industrial accident or industrial disease. This does not mean that the employer cannot fairly dismiss, although if the employee is claiming damages for the injury in a Court case they will also be able to claim their loss of employment if they are dismissed.

In cases where the sickness absence is caused by the employee’s treatment at work, the employer will be expected to investigate this and seek to resolve this before considering dismissal.

 

Frequent short term sickness absences

Strictly speaking this is likely to come under the “some other substantial reason” category.

The principles are similar to capability (ability to do the job) in that before dismissal the employee should be informed:-

1. The level of sickness absence which the employer considers cannot be tolerated long term,

2. If their sickness absence exceeds those levels

3. The employee should be given a period of time to improve their sickness absence record

4. If their sickness absence does not reach an acceptable level the employer is entitled to consider dismissal.

5. Before dismissal the employer should arrange to meet the employee to discuss the sickness absences and decide whether the employee’s sickness absence is likely to be within an acceptable level. If not the employer can dismiss but the employee will be entitled to their contractual notice.

 

Tips for finding a solicitor to deal with an unfair dismissal claim

Specialist legal knowledge and experience is a good start, but to “get the edge” it is useful to find a solicitor with experience of representing clients at Employment Tribunals, particularly at the Employment Tribunal where your case is likely to be heard. This is because familiarity with the way a Tribunal is likely to assess particular cases and particular circumstances helps effective advice and preparation right from the start.

Most of our experience here at John Halson solicitors is based in representing clients at the Liverpool Employment Tribunal which covers claims arising from people who have worked in north and central Cheshire including Chester, Warrington, Northwich, Middlewich, Winsford, Tarporley, Ellesmere Port, Great Sutton; and Merseyside including Liverpool, Birkenhead and the Wirral,  Widnes, Runcorn, St Helens, Kirkby, Maghull, Skelmersdale, Ormskirk, Southport, and Formby.

We also regularly appear in the Manchester Employment Tribunal and occasionally in the Leeds, Birmingham and Shrewsbury Tribunals.

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Breach of contract

January 17th, 2010

Introduction

The relationship between employer and employee is governed by a contract of employment. A contract is an agreement and may be in writing, verbal or partly in writing and partly verbal. Employment Contracts also include implied terms which can either be implied by “custom and practice” or by the law. Collective agreements made between Trade Unions and Employers can also be incorporated into employees contracts.

Most disagreements between employers and employees which end in litigation are brought under specific Employment legislation, but it is possible to bring claims for breach of contract in either a Court or, in some cases, and Employment Tribunal.

The most common claims for breach of contract are as follows:-

1. Claim for insufficient notice of termination
2. Failure to pay all wages due
3. Claim for unpaid bonus
4. Claim by employer for breach of restrictive covenant by employee

 
1. Insufficient Notice

When the employer is in breach of contract, this is sometimes called “wrongful dismissal.”

It may be brought because the employer disputes the employee’s notice entitlement or, more commonly because the employer claims that because the employee is guilty of “Gross Misconduct,” they don’t have to give any notice.

An Employment Tribunal or Court will decide whether or not the employee was guilty of gross misconduct. Unlike “Unfair dismissal” there is no concept of “reasonableness” or “contributory fault.” For that reason employees may bring claims for breach of contract at the same time as for unfair dismissal.

There is a requirement for an employee to “mitigate their loss” by seeking new employment. A successful employee will have their notice pay reduced by the amount they have earned (or should have earned) in the notice period.

If an employee is in breach of contract by giving insufficient notice of resignation and employer can sue the employee! This rarely happens because the employer normally has limited financial loss. The employer has a duty to mitigate their loss by hiring a replacement and their claim is only for any financial loss caused by the employee’s early departure. If an employee can show that the employer’s treatment was such that they did not need to give notice (“Constructive Dismissal”) the employer will not succeed.

 

2. Failure to pay wages

If this claim is brought in the Employment Tribunal it is usually a claim for “Unlawful deduction from wages.”

 

3. Unpaid Bonus

Some bonuses are provided for under the contract, and others are discretionary. A Court or Tribunal may have to determine whether there was a contractual bonus and if so what the terms of it were.

Even if the bonus is discretionary, there is an implied contractual term that the employer will use its discretion reasonably.

An employee can therefore claim breach of contract for an unpaid bonus even though it is “discretionary.” If an employer can provide a good reason for exercising its discretion not to award the bonus, the employee’s claim will fail.

 

4. Breach of Restrictive Covenants

There are some terms of an employment contract which continue to operate after employment has come to an end.

There is an implied term of confidentiality in all contracts of employment which means that employees cannot take confidential information about the employer’s business with them after their employment comes to an end.

There can also be specific written terms of the contract which restrict what work an employee can do after the employment comes to an end. These are known as “restrictive covenants.” Usually they specify a period of time and often a geographic restriction on an employee setting up or working for a competing business, or poaching employees to come and work with them.

If an employee breaches a restrictive covenant or the implied duty of confidentiality, an employer can take an injunction out against them and claim compensation for loss of profits, and their legal costs.

However, if the Court finds that the restrictions go further than is necessary to protect the employer’s interests then the whole restriction becomes void. This could be disastrous for an employer who will be unable to prevent the old employee competing, and find that any other employees who leave may feel they can safely ignore the restrictions. For this reason it is important that advice and careful thought is given when putting restrictive covenants into a contract to make sure they have the desired effect, without going too far.

 
Court or Employment Tribunal

In many cases, claims are brought in the Employment Tribunal because its proceedings are more straightforward and takes less time than a Court claim. Also there is no fee for bringing an Employment Tribunal claim, whereas there is usually a Court fee for staring a Court claim.

However, there are restrictions on the types of claims that can be brought in the Employment Tribunal.

1. An Employment Tribunal cannot deal with claims for breach of contract while the employee is still employed (although it can deal with a claim for unlawful deductions from wages).

2. An employer cannot bring a claim of breach of contract to an Employment Tribunal unless the employee brings a breach of contract claim first (In which case the employer can counterclaim)

3. An employer can never bring a claim for breach of restrictive covenants to an Employment Tribunal

4. The Tribunal only has the power to award up to £25,000 for breach of contract. Well paid employees with long notice periods may be able to claim more in a Court claim.

5. Most claims must be brought before an Employment Tribunal within 3 months of the employment terminating, whereas a claim can normally be brought before a Court up to 6 years from when the breach of contract took place.

 

Other possible reasons for bringing claims to a Court rather than an Employment Tribunal are:

1. The Tribunal does not normally order the unsuccessful party to pay the successful party’s costs, whereas in the Court, if a claim is worth more than £5,000 the Court normally orders the unsuccessful party to pay the successful party’s costs. Someone with a strong claim worth more than £5,000 may wish to go to Court in order to recover their legal costs.

2. People living outside major cities might find they have further to travel to the nearest Employment Tribunal than the nearest county Court, as there are 217 County Courts in England & Wales but only 21 Employment Tribunals.

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags:

Age discrimination

January 17th, 2010

 

Definition of age discrimination

It is unlawful to treat a person less favourably because of their age, their perceived age or beause they associate with someone of a paticular age (direct discrimination) and unlawful to impose a provision, criterion or practice which puts persons of a different age group at a disadvantage when compared to others (Indirect discrimination).

 

Scope of unlawful age discrimination

The scope of unlawful discrimination against job applicants and employees includes prohibition of discrimination in offering employment, in the terms of employment, refusing employment, in the way the employer provides access to promotion, transfer, training or receiving any other benefit, subjecting a person to a detriment or dismissing them.

Age related harassment is also unlawful. Harassment is defined as unwanted conduct which has the purpose or effect of violating a person’s dignity or creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading humiliating or offensive environment. This could, for example cover unofficial “initiation rites” imposed on new workers.

It is also unlawful to victimise someone for complaining about age discrimination.

 

Justification

Discrimination on the grounds of age is lawful as long as it is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.”

So, for example a requirement that a job applicant has a certain number of years experience could indirectly discriminate against younger job applicants but might be justified if experience is required for the role.

 

Specific exceptions : age discrimination which is lawful

Some age related discrimination is specifically allowed. This includes different rates of the National Minimum Wage for young workers, service related benefits, redundancy payments, and age related rules in pension schemes.

 

Retirement

The government has abolished the default retirement age of 65, so unless an employer has given notice of retirement before 6th April 2011, it is only in exceptional circumstances that an employer can justify compulsory retirement. An employer can only justify dismissal because the employee has reached a certain age if the employer’s contractual retirement age can be objectively justified. Objective justification has to be a proportionate response to a legitimate aim. In practice this is likely to be difficult for an employer to justify.

If there is no normal or contractual retirement age, then an employee cannot be dismissed fairly because they have reached a certain age unless the employer has given notice of retirement before 6th April 2011 to take effect up to 30th September 2011 (or 30th September 2012 where the employee has been granted an extension) and the employee was age 65 on or before 30th September 2011.

A dismissal for retirement can be fair as long as:-

1. The employee has reached age 65 by the retirement date which must be no later than 30th September 2011; and

2. The employer gave between 6 months and 12 months notice before 6th April 2011;and

3. The employer informed the employee of their right to request an extension to their retirement date; and

4. If the employee made a request to extend their employment, the employer has considered any request, offered the employee a meeting to consider the request and offered the employee an appeal against a refusal to extend the time and a meeting to hear that appeal.

 

If the employer gives less than 6 months notice, or that notice was given on or after 6th April 2011 then unless the employer has a contractual retirement age which can be objectively justified, and acts reasonably in relying on that reason, the dismissal will be unfair and amount to unlawful age discrimination.

 
Enforcing rights

Claims of unlawful discrimination can be brought by job applicants, employees, workers, contractors, and others by issuing a claim in the Employment Tribunal. There is no qualifying period of employment, before a claim can be made, but any claim must be registered with the Tribunal within 3 months of the act of discrimination, or where there has been a series of incidents which can be characterised as a single act of discrimination, within 3 months of the latest  incident of discrimination.

 

There is a provision for a potential Claimant to obtain information in relation to a potential claim of discrimination by sending a questionnaire to the employer.

 
Employers are liable for the discriminatory conduct of their employees even if they did not know about it at the time. Exceptionally, if an employer has done all it can do to prevent unlawful discrimination, it may be able to avoid liability.

 
Claims can also be brought against the individuals who caused the discrimination, employees might choose to do this because they want the individual to be liable for what they did, if there is a risk that the employer can avoid liability, or if there is a risk of the employer’s business going into liquidation.

 

Tips for finding a solicitor to deal with a claim of discrimination

Specialist legal knowledge and experience is a good start, but to “get the edge” it is useful to find a solicitor with experience of representing clients at Employment Tribunals, particularly at the Employment Tribunal where your case is likely to be heard. This is because familiarity with the way a Tribunal is likely to assess particular cases and particular circumstances helps effective advice and preparation right from the start.

Most of our experience here at John Halson solicitors is based in representing clients at the Liverpool Employment Tribunal which covers claims arising from people who have worked in north and central Cheshire including Chester, Warrington, Northwich, Middlewich, Winsford, Tarporley, Ellesmere Port, Great Sutton, Frodsham; and Merseyside including Liverpool, Birkenhead and the Wirral,  Widnes, Runcorn, St Helens, Kirkby, Maghull, Skelmersdale, Ormskirk, Southport, and Formby.

We also regularly appear in the Manchester Employment Tribunal and occasionally in the Leeds, Birmingham and Shrewsbury Tribunals.

 

Links

ACAS Guidance

Government guidance

Equality and Human rights Commission

Age UK

 

Disclaimer

Please note that the information on this page is intended to be a guideline and is therefore a summary of the law only and not a complete guide. Before taking any action based on this information you are strongly advised to take legal advice. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the information contained on this page is up to date and accurate, no guarantee can be given to this effect.

Categories: Employment Law Tags: